HiFi SPECS

A/B comparison · Speakers

Piega TMicro 40 AMT vs ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52

Specs from both manufacturer datasheets Updated May 24, 2024

CH A Piega TMicro 40 AMT

Piega TMicro 40 AMT

Channel A · Bookshelf · 2018
VS
CH B ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52

ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52

Channel B · Bookshelf · 2020
Piega TMicro 40 AMT ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52
20 Hz 100 1k 10k 20k
8.9/10ELAC

Rows won, of 10 compared Piega 1 · ELAC 0 · tied or not compared 9

Datasheet · Side by side

Spec by spec

Built from both structured spec sheets. The delta chip sits on the winning side; rows with no defensible winner carry no chip.

Sound & drivers

2-way Configuration 3-way
1x 4.72" Mid-woofer Drivers 1x 1" Tweeter + 1x 4.5" Mid-woofer
50 Hz to 40 kHz Frequency responseReference not published 46 Hz to 35 kHz
Ported (Bass Reflex) Enclosure Ported (Bass Reflex)

Power, electrical, physical

87 dB SensitivityReference not published 85 dB
4 Ω Impedance 6 Ω
20 to 150 W Amp range 40 to 140 W
Not published Speaker terminals 5-way binding posts From the Amazon listing Source
240 mm · 19.4 lb Height · weight 364 mm
5 yr +2 yr Warranty 3 yr

A higher sensitivity figure means the same loudness from less amplifier power. Values come from each manufacturer datasheet.

+ Add another product Line up a third or fourth product next to these two in the comparison tool.

Availability

Where they stand on price

Piega TMicro 40 AMT
Availability last checked May 24, 2024
ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52
Availability last checked May 24, 2024

We do not show live prices; price tiers are our editorial categories. As an Amazon Associate, HiFi Specs earns from qualifying purchases. Our scores and comparisons are never influenced by affiliate partners.