A/B comparison · Speakers

Mission QX-2 vs Klipsch RP-8000F II

Specs from both manufacturer datasheets Updated Mar 9, 2025

CH A

Mission QX-2

Channel A · Bookshelf · 2018

CH B

Klipsch RP-8000F II

Channel B · Floorstanding (Tower) · 2022

Mission QX-2 Klipsch RP-8000F II

20 Hz 100 1k 10k 20k

8.7/10Klipsch

Rows won, of 12 compared Mission 0 · Klipsch 3 · tied or not compared 9

Datasheet · Side by side

Spec by spec

Built from both structured spec sheets. The delta chip sits on the winning side; rows with no defensible winner carry no chip.

Sound & drivers

2-way Configuration 2-way

1x 1.5" Tweeter + 1x 6.5" Mid-woofer Drivers 1x 1" Tweeter + 1x 8" Woofer

44 Hz to 24 kHz ±3 dB · 38 Hz extended Frequency response 32 Hz to 25 kHz -12 Hz deeper ±3 dB

95 dB Max SPL 126 dB +31 dB

Ported (Bass Reflex) Enclosure Ported (Bass Reflex)

Not published Port tuning 32 Hz

Power, electrical, physical

88 dB SensitivityReference not published 98 dB 2.83 V/1 m

8 Ω Impedance 8 Ω

25 to 120 W Amp range 150 W

Not published Speaker terminals 5-way binding posts

320 mm Height · weight 1095 mm · 61.4 lb

1 yr Warranty 5 yr +4 yr

A higher sensitivity figure means the same loudness from less amplifier power. Values come from each manufacturer datasheet.

+ Add another product Line up a third or fourth product next to these two in the comparison tool.

Availability

Where they stand on price

Mission QX-2

Check price on Amazon Full specs

Availability last checked Mar 9, 2025

Klipsch RP-8000F II

Check price on Amazon Read our review Full specs

Availability last checked Mar 9, 2025

We do not show live prices; price tiers are our editorial categories. As an Amazon Associate, HiFi Specs earns from qualifying purchases. Our scores and comparisons are never influenced by affiliate partners.

Acoustic Energy AE100 vs Mission QX-2 Acoustic Energy AE1 vs Mission QX-2 Dynaudio Emit M20 vs Mission QX-2 Dayton Audio T652 vs Mission QX-2 Open the comparison tool