A/B comparison · Speakers
Acoustic Energy 301 speakers vs Klipsch RP-160M
Specs from both manufacturer datasheets Updated May 26, 2024
Acoustic Energy 301 speakers vs Klipsch RP-160M in brief
- Spec rows: Acoustic Energy 301 speakers wins 0, Klipsch RP-160M wins 1, 9 tied or not compared, of 10 rows.
- Our scores: Acoustic Energy 301 speakers 8.9/10, Klipsch RP-160M 8.5/10.
- Acoustic Energy 301 speakers wins: sound quality (9 vs 8.6), midrange clarity (9.2 vs 8.8), treble detail (8.8 vs 8), design (8.7 vs 8.4), value for money (9.5 vs 8.7).
- Klipsch RP-160M wins: bass response (8.5 vs 8).
- Who should buy which: Pick the Acoustic Energy 301 speakers for sound quality, midrange clarity, treble detail, design and value for money. Pick the Klipsch RP-160M if bass response matters most.
Channel A · Bookshelf · 2013
Channel B · Bookshelf · 2015
Rows won, of 10 compared Acoustic Energy 0 · Klipsch 1 · tied or not compared 9
Datasheet · Side by side
Spec by spec
Built from both structured spec sheets. The delta chip sits on the winning side; rows with no defensible winner carry no chip.
Sound & drivers
Power, electrical, physical
A higher sensitivity figure means the same loudness from less amplifier power. Values come from each manufacturer datasheet.
+ Add another product Line up a third or fourth product next to these two in the comparison tool.
From our reviews
How it scored, paired
6 aspects, two channels
Each aspect is scored 0 to 10 in our reviews, against the rest of the class.
Availability
Where they stand on price
Acoustic Energy 301 speakers
Klipsch RP-160M
The Klipsch RP-160M isn't sold new any more. The closest current model is the Klipsch RP-600M II.
Why this one: Same RP bookshelf line with 6.5 in woofer that directly replaced the RP-160M in the lineup
We do not show live prices; price tiers are our editorial categories. As an Amazon Associate, HiFi Specs earns from qualifying purchases. Our scores and comparisons are never influenced by affiliate partners.